Crop Protection: How to Lead Innovation in R&D Teams (Part 5)

Editor’s note: This is the fifth of seven articles in a series on Strategic R&D Management in AgChem and BioScience to be published on For a full list of the articles, click here.

In the previous article in this series on Strategic R&D Management in AgChem and BioScience, we learned how the SMART-TECH Industry builds on the BioPesticide industries value proposition to create a new “Blue Ocean” in Crop Protection. In this article, we will learn how to lead innovation in R&D teams.

To successfully manage the critical interface between strategy (vision) and execution for innovation portfolios, it is necessary to introduce an iterative, input-based and inclusive development framework to promote the inclusion and buy-in of expert teams.

How do we ensure a speak-up culture?

Traditionally, crop protection companies have implemented a classic management career track. In this system, competent R&D scientists are promoted to management positions, and it is from these positions that contributions are made to business strategy.

Unfortunately, it is not always the case that the most competent experts become the best managers or strategists, and it is quite common for excellent scientists to attain management positions and subsequently leave the company to return to the bench.

Alternatively, talented scientists may refuse promotion to managerial positions, and their input to strategic decisions is lost.

The introduction of an expert-career track (paralleling the management career track in a dual career track system) is a way to provide experienced and talented scientists with the opportunity to contribute to business strategy at a managerial level, without the constraints of a managerial career track.

Figure 1: Dual career track system.

Here, talented scientists progress through Senior and Principal Scientist levels to the position of Research Fellow, at which level they have the same opportunity to provide strategic input as an R&D Director, for example.

How do we promote bottom-up initiatives?

Conventional, output-based incremental development frameworks are appropriate for the management of incremental (conventional) development projects, and output-based measures of performance such as KPIs are easy to define.

However, incremental frameworks may hinder the iterative R&D process of innovation, and KPI’s and bonus incentives often prove detrimental to the innovation process. Simply put, bonuses do not always motivate scientists.

Figure 2: Input-based performance measurement in an Inclusive Management Framework.

For innovation projects, measures of input-based performance can be more appropriate, although the identification and quantification of these performance measures prove challenging for many companies.

An example of an appropriate measure could be the quantification and recognition of learning provided to the project or company by the individual.

For input-based innovation projects, one objective of measuring performance is to provide a means to end the innovation process (e.g., by defining a minimum viable product).

How do we lead and motivate expert teams?

Innovation and inclusion of expertise from the “execution” or “down” organizational layer entails recognizing and legitimizing innovation and learning inputs as a measure of input-based performance.

At the same time, clear expectations of independent, individual innovation should be included in R&D job descriptions.

“It doesn’t make sense to hire smart people and then tell them what to do, we hire smart people so they can tell us what to do.” – Steve Jobs

R&D experts should always have the freedom to challenge the existing R&D framework, to ensure “bottom-up” integration (e.g., by critically evaluating project-group makeup): “Is biology adequately represented throughout the project time plan?” and “Do evaluation criteria also measure learning?”.

Rather than monetary bonuses, R&D staff may be better motivated through the provision of time for them to pursue non-project related innovation initiatives, opportunities for scientific publication and increased access to scientific congresses and conferences not directly relevant for the company’s core business.

Increased flexibility in working hours and locations for R&D staff as well as increased autonomy have also proven to be effective motivators.

Finally, the visible inclusion of R&D input into strategic business decisions by encouraging a speak-up culture and promoting bottom-up initiatives is a key factor in ensuring the motivation of expert teams.

In this next article of this series, we will learn about Managing Innovation Processes in R&D.

Thanks for reading. Please feel free to read and share my other articles.

If you found this article interesting, you will find more useful information in STRATEGIC R&D MANAGEMENT: AGCHEM & BIOSCIENCE by Harry Teicher. Aimed at managers, researchers, and others wishing to understand basic strategic aspects of Crop Protection, this book is an easily accessible introduction to essential principles of Strategic R&D Management.

For more information, visit BIOSCIENCE SOLUTIONS – contributing to the development of sustainable Crop Protection solutions by providing independent Strategic R&D Management and Scientific support to AgChem and BioSolutions Businesses developing science-based products.


Leave a Reply



Clariant, Eastman Enter Distribution Agreement

Clariant, a world leader in specialty chemicals, and Eastman Chemical Company, a global advanced materials and specialty additives company, announced


What Does a Traceability Software Product Do in Agribusiness?

Editor’s note: This article was originally published on LinkedIn. I’ve been traveling over the last one week, on-boarding our first large


University of Utah Recognizes Aqua-Yield/Nano Institute Partnership in New Annual Report

In a newly-published annual report, the University of Utah’s Center for Technology & Venture Commercialization (TVC) touts the first-of-its-kind collaboration

Corn closeup

Bayer Posts More Than 300 Glyphosate Safety Studies Online

Today, Bayer marks the first anniversary of its Transparency Initiative, designed to enhance trust in the science behind crop protection


UPL Mauritius to Acquire Bioquim Group

UPL Mauritius, a subsidiary of UPL, India is set to acquire 100% shares of Bioquim Group which includes companies based

Aphids Cotton

Nichino America Gets EPA Approval for Insecticide

PQZ insecticide from Nichino America, Inc. has been granted a U.S. EPA label expansion for food crop use, the company


Crystal Crop Protection Acquires Three Syngenta Brands

New Delhi-headquartered Crystal Crop Protection, a firm backed by private equity firm Everstone Capital, has acquired three insecticide and fungicide


Bayer to Offer Access to Glyphosate Studies

Bayer will soon include safety study summaries of glyphosate on its dedicated transparency platform. This next step will mark the first


What to Expect for U.S. Dicamba Use in 2019

Long-awaited news from U.S. Environmental Protection Agency on its decision to extend the registration for the new dicamba technologies arrived Halloween


Bayer: Study Shows its Soybeans Reduce Environmental Impact

Results from a five-year peer-reviewed study on Intacta RR2 PRO™ soybeans planted in South America were recently published, indicating that


A Salute to Retired CropLife America President Jay Vroom

Editor’s note: It goes without saying that crop protection manufacturing is a central point of interest to readers of this


Expect Herbicide Price Hikes in 2019

Herbicide price hikes across the board are an inevitability for 2019, as the entire U.S. ag community deals with a


Corteva to Launch New Fungicide, Starting in Asia Pacific

Corteva Agriscience announced Adavelt active as the new brand name for a novel fungicide that will offer farmers curative and


Albaugh Discusses 2018 Trials of CoAXium Wheat System

Albaugh announced that the CoAXium Wheat Production System driven by Aggressor herbicide exceeded expectations in 2018 performance evaluation trials, demonstrating


FMC Launches Insecticide/Fungicide

FMC Corp. has launched Ethos 3D insecticide/fungicide, formulated specifically for the novel 3RIVE 3D in-furrow application system that converts traditional


The U.S. Battle over Glyphosate Has ‘Old World’ Roots

Although it’s been in use since 1974, glyphosate has come under intense attack here in the U.S. just recently, writes

Africa/Middle East

Kenya’s Crop Protection Industry Fears ‘Dire Consequences’ of New Pesticides Tax

The agrichemcials industry in Kenya is up in arms over a decision by the government to impose a 16% value-added


U.S. EPA Renews Dicamba Label, with New Restrictions

Long-awaited news from U.S. EPA came on the evening of Oct. 31 that it has decided to renew the label


ADAMA Hit by Drought in Europe, Higher Sourcing Costs

Shortage in certain raw materials and intermediates, mostly owing to increased environmental focus in China, led to higher procurement costs

Latest News


India: Enabling Modern Agriculture Through IoT

Since the first green revolution in the 1960s that radically transformed the face of Indian agriculture, the sector has consistently


Reuters: Trump Greenlights Next Round of Farm Payments in China Trade War

The Trump administration will move forward with plans to distribute a second round of payments to farmers caught in the

Markets Top 10 Stories from 2018

What a year it’s been for the global agribusiness industry. While the mergers and acquisitions once again dominated headlines in

Trade Summit

Three Things We Learned at Trade Summit Southeast Asia

Since 2006 AgriBusiness Global™ (ABG) has hosted Trade Summits in all corners of the world in an effort to empower


AgFunder Releases India AgriFood Startup Investing Report

AgFunder has released the inaugural India AgriFood Startup Investing Report in collaboration with its report partner Omnivore. In this five-year