{"id":53048,"date":"2015-03-23T22:42:30","date_gmt":"2015-03-24T02:42:30","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.farmchemicalsinternational.com\/?p=53048"},"modified":"2019-09-25T06:30:53","modified_gmt":"2019-09-25T10:30:53","slug":"monsantos-fraley-outraged-by-who-glyphosate-assessment","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/es\/agrochemicals\/monsantos-fraley-outraged-by-who-glyphosate-assessment\/","title":{"rendered":"Fraley de Monsanto &#039;indignado&#039; por la evaluaci\u00f3n de glifosato de la OMS"},"content":{"rendered":"<div id=\"attachment_35860\" style=\"width: 310px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-35860\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-35860\" src=\"https:\/\/www.farmchemicalsinternational.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/06\/35860-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"Fraley\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/06\/35860-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/06\/35860-330x220.jpg 330w, https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/06\/35860-107x72.jpg 107w, https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/06\/35860-85x56.jpg 85w, https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/06\/35860-150x100.jpg 150w, https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/06\/35860.jpg 448w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><p id=\"caption-attachment-35860\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Fraley<\/p><\/div>\n<p>Monsanto Co. conden\u00f3 el lunes la clasificaci\u00f3n de glifosato de la semana pasada como probable carcin\u00f3geno por la Agencia Internacional para la Investigaci\u00f3n del C\u00e1ncer (IARC) de la Organizaci\u00f3n Mundial de la Salud.<\/p>\n<p>&quot;Estamos indignados con esta evaluaci\u00f3n&quot;, dijo el Dr. Robb Fraley, director de tecnolog\u00eda de Monsanto. \u201cEsta conclusi\u00f3n es incompatible con las d\u00e9cadas de <a href=\"http:\/\/cts.businesswire.com\/ct\/CT?id=smartlink&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.glyphosate.eu%2Fregulatory-documents%2Fregulatory-documents&amp;esheet=51064408&amp;newsitemid=20150323006198&amp;lan=en-US&amp;anchor=comprehensive+safety+reviews&amp;index=1&amp;md5=b3438b4457fdcced44eb736043ea1ee8\" rel=\"nofollow\">revisiones exhaustivas de seguridad<\/a> por las principales autoridades reguladoras de todo el mundo que han concluido que todos los usos etiquetados del glifosato son seguros para la salud humana. Este resultado se alcanz\u00f3 mediante una &#039;selecci\u00f3n selectiva&#039; de datos y es un claro ejemplo de sesgo impulsado por la agenda &quot;.<\/p>\n<p>Las evaluaciones de seguridad repetidas por las autoridades reguladoras durante las \u00faltimas tres d\u00e9cadas han formado la base de la larga historia de uso seguro y altamente efectivo de este <a href=\"http:\/\/cts.businesswire.com\/ct\/CT?id=smartlink&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.monsanto.com%2Fglyphosate%2Fpages%2Fdefault.aspx&amp;esheet=51064408&amp;newsitemid=20150323006198&amp;lan=en-US&amp;anchor=important+agricultural+tool&amp;index=2&amp;md5=86f9a1c9f3f5037f2b1eced9813c2c1f\" rel=\"nofollow\">importante herramienta agr\u00edcola<\/a> en m\u00e1s de 160 pa\u00edses de todo el mundo, dijo Monsanto.<\/p>\n<p>La IARC clasific\u00f3 el glifosato y los insecticidas malati\u00f3n y diazin\u00f3n como \u201cprobablemente cancer\u00edgenos para los seres humanos\u201d (Grupo 2A). Dijo que la evidencia en humanos proviene de estudios de exposiciones, principalmente agr\u00edcolas, en los Estados Unidos, Canad\u00e1 y Suecia desde 2001. Para el glifosato, hab\u00eda &quot;evidencia limitada de carcinogenicidad&quot; en humanos para el linfoma no Hodgkin, y hubo &quot;convincentes evidencia \u201dde que el glifosato puede causar c\u00e1ncer en animales de laboratorio, dijo la IARC.<\/p>\n<p>La agencia no tiene autoridad reguladora y su decisi\u00f3n no afecta la etiqueta, el registro actual o el uso del glifosato.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cLa seguridad es la m\u00e1xima prioridad para todas las personas que trabajan en Monsanto. Los herbicidas a base de glifosato en el mercado cumplen con los rigurosos est\u00e1ndares establecidos por las autoridades reguladoras y de salud que trabajan todos los d\u00edas para proteger la salud humana, y queremos que nuestros clientes y consumidores est\u00e9n seguros de estas evaluaciones \u201d, agreg\u00f3 Fraley.<\/p>\n<p>Monsanto dijo que, en contraste con la revisi\u00f3n integral que los reguladores de todo el mundo han completado durante tres d\u00e9cadas, la IARC emiti\u00f3 su clasificaci\u00f3n basada en una revisi\u00f3n de datos limitada despu\u00e9s de horas de discusi\u00f3n en una reuni\u00f3n de una semana. Adem\u00e1s, la IARC es uno de los cuatro programas dentro de la OMS que han revisado la seguridad del glifosato y su clasificaci\u00f3n es inconsistente con las evaluaciones de los otros programas. Dos de los programas de la OMS, el Grupo de Evaluaci\u00f3n Central y el Programa Internacional sobre Seguridad Qu\u00edmica, concluyeron que el glifosato no es cancer\u00edgeno. El programa de las Directrices de la OMS para la calidad del agua potable concluy\u00f3 que el glifosato no representa un peligro para la salud humana.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cEl trabajo de la IARC no es un estudio y no hace referencia a nuevos datos o estudios\u201d, dijo Fraley. \u201cEn cambio, la IARC solo analiz\u00f3 un n\u00famero limitado de estudios existentes. Agencias respetadas de todo el mundo han analizado los mismos estudios, y muchos m\u00e1s, y han determinado que todos los usos etiquetados del glifosato son seguros. El proceso de la IARC no es transparente, su decisi\u00f3n es irresponsable y tiene el potencial de causar confusi\u00f3n sobre un tema tan importante como la seguridad \u201d.<\/p>\n<p>Monsanto se une a otros miembros del Grupo de trabajo sobre glifosato de la UE y del Grupo de trabajo conjunto sobre glifosato en desacuerdo con la clasificaci\u00f3n de la IARC por las siguientes razones:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li class=\"bwlistitemmargb\"><span class=\"bwuline\"><b>La clasificaci\u00f3n de IARC no es un estudio. No hay nuevos datos aqu\u00ed.<\/b><\/span> Tan recientemente como enero, el <a href=\"http:\/\/cts.businesswire.com\/ct\/CT?id=smartlink&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fdar.efsa.europa.eu%2Fdar-web%2Fprovision&amp;esheet=51064408&amp;newsitemid=20150323006198&amp;lan=en-US&amp;anchor=German+government&amp;index=3&amp;md5=498a59ed591a2cd78a789063b9a07ec8\" rel=\"nofollow\">Gobierno aleman<\/a> complet\u00f3 una rigurosa evaluaci\u00f3n de cuatro a\u00f1os de glifosato para la Uni\u00f3n Europea. Los reguladores alemanes revisaron todos los estudios que la IARC consider\u00f3, y significativamente m\u00e1s, y concluyeron que &quot;era poco probable que el glifosato representara un riesgo carcinog\u00e9nico en los seres humanos&quot;.<\/li>\n<li class=\"bwlistitemmargb\"><span class=\"bwuline\"><b>Los datos cient\u00edficos relevantes fueron excluidos de la revisi\u00f3n.<\/b><\/span> La IARC ignor\u00f3 y no reconoci\u00f3 docenas de estudios cient\u00edficos que respaldan la conclusi\u00f3n de que el glifosato no es un riesgo para la salud humana. Un estudio en particular que ignoraron fue el <a href=\"http:\/\/cts.businesswire.com\/ct\/CT?id=smartlink&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Faghealth.nih.gov%2F&amp;esheet=51064408&amp;newsitemid=20150323006198&amp;lan=en-US&amp;anchor=Agricultural+Health+Study&amp;index=4&amp;md5=e31ef104a5ca41371a07e4926e2e12d1\" rel=\"nofollow\">Estudio de sanidad agr\u00edcola<\/a> - un estudio multimillonario de 20 a\u00f1os financiado por contribuyentes estadounidenses para estudiar el c\u00e1ncer y otros resultados de salud entre los agricultores y sus c\u00f3nyuges. M\u00e1s de 89,000 personas han participado en este estudio desde 1993, y 20 a\u00f1os de datos de estudios apoyan la conclusi\u00f3n de que no hay evidencia cre\u00edble de que el glifosato pueda causar c\u00e1ncer.<\/li>\n<li class=\"bwlistitemmargb\"><span class=\"bwuline\"><b>La conclusi\u00f3n no est\u00e1 respaldada por datos cient\u00edficos.<\/b><\/span> La clasificaci\u00f3n de la IARC es incompatible con las numerosas evaluaciones exhaustivas realizadas por cientos de cient\u00edficos de pa\u00edses de todo el mundo que son responsables de garantizar la seguridad p\u00fablica. Adem\u00e1s, la IARC tergivers\u00f3 flagrantemente los resultados y las conclusiones de un <a href=\"http:\/\/cts.businesswire.com\/ct\/CT?id=smartlink&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwhqlibdoc.who.int%2Fpublications%2F2006%2F9241665203_eng.pdf%3Fua%3D1&amp;esheet=51064408&amp;newsitemid=20150323006198&amp;lan=en-US&amp;anchor=2004+Joint+United+Nations+Food+and+Agriculture+Organization+%2FWHO+Meeting+on+Pesticide+Residues+%28JMPR%29&amp;index=5&amp;md5=becafb9c591f129aaf251a82bd7c66c6\" rel=\"nofollow\">Reuni\u00f3n conjunta de la Organizaci\u00f3n de las Naciones Unidas para la Agricultura y la Alimentaci\u00f3n y la OMS sobre residuos de plaguicidas (JMPR) de 2004<\/a>. En su resumen en l\u00ednea del 20 de marzo en Lancet Oncology, la IARC cita espec\u00edficamente una oraci\u00f3n del informe de la FAO \/ OMS de 2004, cuando, a solo varias oraciones de distancia, el informe dice claramente: \u201cEn conclusi\u00f3n, la administraci\u00f3n de glifosato ... no produjo signos de potencial carcinog\u00e9nico cualquier dosis &quot;. Este estudio tambi\u00e9n ha sido revisado por numerosas agencias reguladoras de todo el mundo, y todas han concluido que no hay evidencia de carcinogenicidad.<\/li>\n<li class=\"bwlistitemmargb\"><span class=\"bwuline\"><b>La clasificaci\u00f3n de la IARC no establece un v\u00ednculo entre el glifosato y un aumento de c\u00e1ncer.<\/b><\/span> La revisi\u00f3n de la IARC es limitada y el proceso est\u00e1 dise\u00f1ado para dar como resultado clasificaciones posibles y probables. La evaluaci\u00f3n de la IARC del glifosato es similar a su evaluaci\u00f3n impugnada de otros art\u00edculos cotidianos como el caf\u00e9, los tel\u00e9fonos celulares, las verduras en escabeche y las ocupaciones que incluyen el peluquero y el cocinero de fre\u00edr.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>\u201cLas conclusiones sobre algo tan importante como la seguridad y la salud humana deben basarse en un proceso cient\u00edfico imparcial, exhaustivo y riguroso que se adhiera a los est\u00e1ndares reconocidos internacionalmente\u201d, agreg\u00f3 Fraley. \u201cDesafortunadamente, en este caso, la revisi\u00f3n de la IARC no cumpli\u00f3 con los est\u00e1ndares utilizados por las agencias reguladoras respetadas en todo el mundo. Quisiera pedirle a la gente que no crea en nuestra palabra, pero que mire el <a href=\"http:\/\/cts.businesswire.com\/ct\/CT?id=smartlink&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.glyphosate.eu%2Fregulatory-documents%2Fregulatory-documents&amp;esheet=51064408&amp;newsitemid=20150323006198&amp;lan=en-US&amp;anchor=decades+of+conclusions+from+respected+regulators&amp;index=6&amp;md5=ebbcd55d6f8a0bc6cd95c5529ac61a02\" rel=\"nofollow\">d\u00e9cadas de conclusiones de reguladores respetados<\/a>. Dada la importancia de la seguridad del glifosato tanto para los consumidores como para los productores, continuaremos atendiendo urgentemente nuestra solicitud de que la OMS brinde transparencia en el proceso de la IARC y d\u00e9 cuenta de los estudios utilizados y descartados para llegar a su conclusi\u00f3n &quot;.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> &quot;El resultado se alcanz\u00f3 mediante una &#039;selecci\u00f3n selectiva&#039; de datos y es un claro ejemplo de sesgo impulsado por la agenda&quot;. \u2013Fraley<\/p>","protected":false},"author":72,"featured_media":35860,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[4,26,29,19],"tags":[554,170,135,583,653],"class_list":["post-53048","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-agrochemicals","category-americas","category-europe","category-herbicides","tag-featured","tag-glyphosate","tag-monsanto","tag-regulatory","tag-who"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.7 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Monsanto&#039;s Fraley &#039;Outraged&#039; by WHO Glyphosate Assessment - AgriBusiness Global<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"&quot;Result was reached by selective \u2018cherry picking\u2019 of data and is a clear example of agenda-driven bias.\u201d --Fraley\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/es\/agrochemicals\/monsantos-fraley-outraged-by-who-glyphosate-assessment\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"es_MX\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Monsanto&#039;s Fraley &#039;Outraged&#039; by WHO Glyphosate Assessment - AgriBusiness Global\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"&quot;Result was reached by selective \u2018cherry picking\u2019 of data and is a clear example of agenda-driven bias.\u201d --Fraley\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/es\/agrochemicals\/monsantos-fraley-outraged-by-who-glyphosate-assessment\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"AgriBusiness Global\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2015-03-24T02:42:30+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-09-25T10:30:53+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/06\/35860.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"448\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"299\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Jackie Pucci\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/06\/35860.jpg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Escrito por\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Jackie Pucci\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Tiempo de lectura\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\\\/agrochemicals\\\/monsantos-fraley-outraged-by-who-glyphosate-assessment\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\\\/agrochemicals\\\/monsantos-fraley-outraged-by-who-glyphosate-assessment\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Jackie Pucci\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\\\/pt\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/1c6aa6d7370c670e1cdec6e0a547feec\"},\"headline\":\"Monsanto&#8217;s Fraley &#8216;Outraged&#8217; by WHO Glyphosate Assessment\",\"datePublished\":\"2015-03-24T02:42:30+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-09-25T10:30:53+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\\\/agrochemicals\\\/monsantos-fraley-outraged-by-who-glyphosate-assessment\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":927,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\\\/pt\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\\\/agrochemicals\\\/monsantos-fraley-outraged-by-who-glyphosate-assessment\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2012\\\/06\\\/35860.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"featured\",\"glyphosate\",\"Monsanto\",\"regulatory\",\"WHO\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Agrochemicals\",\"Americas\",\"Europe\",\"Herbicides\"],\"inLanguage\":\"es-MX\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\\\/agrochemicals\\\/monsantos-fraley-outraged-by-who-glyphosate-assessment\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\\\/agrochemicals\\\/monsantos-fraley-outraged-by-who-glyphosate-assessment\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\\\/agrochemicals\\\/monsantos-fraley-outraged-by-who-glyphosate-assessment\\\/\",\"name\":\"Monsanto's Fraley 'Outraged' by WHO Glyphosate Assessment - AgriBusiness Global\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\\\/pt\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\\\/agrochemicals\\\/monsantos-fraley-outraged-by-who-glyphosate-assessment\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\\\/agrochemicals\\\/monsantos-fraley-outraged-by-who-glyphosate-assessment\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2012\\\/06\\\/35860.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2015-03-24T02:42:30+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-09-25T10:30:53+00:00\",\"description\":\"\\\"Result was reached by selective \u2018cherry picking\u2019 of data and is a clear example of agenda-driven bias.\u201d --Fraley\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\\\/agrochemicals\\\/monsantos-fraley-outraged-by-who-glyphosate-assessment\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"es-MX\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\\\/agrochemicals\\\/monsantos-fraley-outraged-by-who-glyphosate-assessment\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"es-MX\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\\\/agrochemicals\\\/monsantos-fraley-outraged-by-who-glyphosate-assessment\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2012\\\/06\\\/35860.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2012\\\/06\\\/35860.jpg\",\"width\":448,\"height\":299,\"caption\":\"Dr. Robb Fraley is recognized as the father of agricultural biotechnology, and has been involved in research on agricultural biotechnology since the early 1980s.\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\\\/agrochemicals\\\/monsantos-fraley-outraged-by-who-glyphosate-assessment\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\\\/pt\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Monsanto&#8217;s Fraley &#8216;Outraged&#8217; by WHO Glyphosate Assessment\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\\\/pt\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\\\/pt\\\/\",\"name\":\"AgriBusiness Global\",\"description\":\"Empowering Agriculture to Feed the World\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\\\/pt\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\\\/pt\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"es-MX\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\\\/pt\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"AgriBusiness Global\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\\\/pt\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"es-MX\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\\\/pt\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/d6kq167ddwbdq.cloudfront.net\\\/farmchemint\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/06\\\/ABG-logo-250x150px-01.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/d6kq167ddwbdq.cloudfront.net\\\/farmchemint\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/06\\\/ABG-logo-250x150px-01.png\",\"width\":251,\"height\":151,\"caption\":\"AgriBusiness Global\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\\\/pt\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\\\/pt\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/1c6aa6d7370c670e1cdec6e0a547feec\",\"name\":\"Jackie Pucci\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"es-MX\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/a4cf94eb8dc1f27084423a3b596864af07d406abcf684c9a772846cabe1c8592?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/a4cf94eb8dc1f27084423a3b596864af07d406abcf684c9a772846cabe1c8592?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/a4cf94eb8dc1f27084423a3b596864af07d406abcf684c9a772846cabe1c8592?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Jackie Pucci\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\\\/es\\\/author\\\/jackie-pucci\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Fraley de Monsanto &#039;indignado&#039; por evaluaci\u00f3n de glifosato de la OMS - AgriBusiness Global","description":"&quot;El resultado se alcanz\u00f3 mediante una &#039;selecci\u00f3n selectiva&#039; de datos y es un claro ejemplo de sesgo impulsado por la agenda&quot;. --Fraley","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/es\/agrochemicals\/monsantos-fraley-outraged-by-who-glyphosate-assessment\/","og_locale":"es_MX","og_type":"article","og_title":"Monsanto's Fraley 'Outraged' by WHO Glyphosate Assessment - AgriBusiness Global","og_description":"\"Result was reached by selective \u2018cherry picking\u2019 of data and is a clear example of agenda-driven bias.\u201d --Fraley","og_url":"https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/es\/agrochemicals\/monsantos-fraley-outraged-by-who-glyphosate-assessment\/","og_site_name":"AgriBusiness Global","article_published_time":"2015-03-24T02:42:30+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-09-25T10:30:53+00:00","og_image":[{"width":448,"height":299,"url":"https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/06\/35860.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Jackie Pucci","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_image":"https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/06\/35860.jpg","twitter_misc":{"Escrito por":"Jackie Pucci","Tiempo de lectura":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/agrochemicals\/monsantos-fraley-outraged-by-who-glyphosate-assessment\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/agrochemicals\/monsantos-fraley-outraged-by-who-glyphosate-assessment\/"},"author":{"name":"Jackie Pucci","@id":"https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/pt\/#\/schema\/person\/1c6aa6d7370c670e1cdec6e0a547feec"},"headline":"Monsanto&#8217;s Fraley &#8216;Outraged&#8217; by WHO Glyphosate Assessment","datePublished":"2015-03-24T02:42:30+00:00","dateModified":"2019-09-25T10:30:53+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/agrochemicals\/monsantos-fraley-outraged-by-who-glyphosate-assessment\/"},"wordCount":927,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/pt\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/agrochemicals\/monsantos-fraley-outraged-by-who-glyphosate-assessment\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/06\/35860.jpg","keywords":["featured","glyphosate","Monsanto","regulatory","WHO"],"articleSection":["Agrochemicals","Americas","Europe","Herbicides"],"inLanguage":"es-MX","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/agrochemicals\/monsantos-fraley-outraged-by-who-glyphosate-assessment\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/agrochemicals\/monsantos-fraley-outraged-by-who-glyphosate-assessment\/","url":"https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/agrochemicals\/monsantos-fraley-outraged-by-who-glyphosate-assessment\/","name":"Fraley de Monsanto &#039;indignado&#039; por evaluaci\u00f3n de glifosato de la OMS - AgriBusiness Global","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/pt\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/agrochemicals\/monsantos-fraley-outraged-by-who-glyphosate-assessment\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/agrochemicals\/monsantos-fraley-outraged-by-who-glyphosate-assessment\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/06\/35860.jpg","datePublished":"2015-03-24T02:42:30+00:00","dateModified":"2019-09-25T10:30:53+00:00","description":"&quot;El resultado se alcanz\u00f3 mediante una &#039;selecci\u00f3n selectiva&#039; de datos y es un claro ejemplo de sesgo impulsado por la agenda&quot;. --Fraley","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/agrochemicals\/monsantos-fraley-outraged-by-who-glyphosate-assessment\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"es-MX","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/agrochemicals\/monsantos-fraley-outraged-by-who-glyphosate-assessment\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"es-MX","@id":"https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/agrochemicals\/monsantos-fraley-outraged-by-who-glyphosate-assessment\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/06\/35860.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/06\/35860.jpg","width":448,"height":299,"caption":"Dr. Robb Fraley is recognized as the father of agricultural biotechnology, and has been involved in research on agricultural biotechnology since the early 1980s."},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/agrochemicals\/monsantos-fraley-outraged-by-who-glyphosate-assessment\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/pt\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Monsanto&#8217;s Fraley &#8216;Outraged&#8217; by WHO Glyphosate Assessment"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/pt\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/pt\/","name":"AgriBusiness Global","description":"Empoderar a la agricultura para alimentar al mundo","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/pt\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/pt\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"es-MX"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/pt\/#organization","name":"AgriBusiness Global","url":"https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/pt\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"es-MX","@id":"https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/pt\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/d6kq167ddwbdq.cloudfront.net\/farmchemint\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/ABG-logo-250x150px-01.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/d6kq167ddwbdq.cloudfront.net\/farmchemint\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/ABG-logo-250x150px-01.png","width":251,"height":151,"caption":"AgriBusiness Global"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/pt\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/pt\/#\/schema\/person\/1c6aa6d7370c670e1cdec6e0a547feec","name":"Jackie Pucci","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"es-MX","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a4cf94eb8dc1f27084423a3b596864af07d406abcf684c9a772846cabe1c8592?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a4cf94eb8dc1f27084423a3b596864af07d406abcf684c9a772846cabe1c8592?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a4cf94eb8dc1f27084423a3b596864af07d406abcf684c9a772846cabe1c8592?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Jackie Pucci"},"url":"https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/es\/author\/jackie-pucci\/"}]}},"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/06\/35860.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/53048","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/72"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=53048"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/53048\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/35860"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=53048"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=53048"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=53048"}],"curies":[{"name":"gracias","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}