{"id":53069,"date":"2015-03-25T11:09:20","date_gmt":"2015-03-25T15:09:20","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.farmchemicalsinternational.com\/?p=53069"},"modified":"2019-09-25T06:30:53","modified_gmt":"2019-09-25T10:30:53","slug":"monsanto-calls-for-retraction-of-world-health-organizations-glyphosate-assessment","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/es\/agrochemicals\/monsanto-calls-for-retraction-of-world-health-organizations-glyphosate-assessment\/","title":{"rendered":"Monsanto pide que se retire la evaluaci\u00f3n de glifosato de la OMS"},"content":{"rendered":"<div id=\"attachment_53070\" style=\"width: 310px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-53070\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-53070\" src=\"https:\/\/www.farmchemicalsinternational.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/03\/16470924150_c4ca066cff_z-300x224.jpg\" alt=\"monsanto roundup\" width=\"300\" height=\"224\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/03\/16470924150_c4ca066cff_z-300x224.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/03\/16470924150_c4ca066cff_z-330x246.jpg 330w, https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/03\/16470924150_c4ca066cff_z-96x72.jpg 96w, https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/03\/16470924150_c4ca066cff_z-482x360.jpg 482w, https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/03\/16470924150_c4ca066cff_z-85x63.jpg 85w, https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/03\/16470924150_c4ca066cff_z-150x112.jpg 150w, https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/03\/16470924150_c4ca066cff_z.jpg 640w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><p id=\"caption-attachment-53070\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Cr\u00e9dito de la foto: usuario de Flickr Mike Mozart, licencia Creative Commons<\/p><\/div>\n<p>Es probable que pocas mentes cambien a causa de la Organizaci\u00f3n Mundial de la Salud. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.farmchemicalsinternational.com\/crop-inputs\/world-health-organization-report-contradicts-scientific-findings-on-glyphosate\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">reclasificaci\u00f3n<\/a> de glifosato como probable carcin\u00f3geno. Eso se debe a que hay pocas cosas nuevas que agregar m\u00e1s que le\u00f1a al fuego.<\/p>\n<p>Para ser claros: la evaluaci\u00f3n del glifosato de la Agencia Internacional para la Investigaci\u00f3n del C\u00e1ncer (IARC) de la OMS no es un estudio, sino m\u00e1s bien una determinaci\u00f3n que surgi\u00f3 de una reuni\u00f3n de una semana de un panel asesor en Lyon, Francia, a principios de este mes. El panel revis\u00f3 un conjunto de datos limitado y decidi\u00f3 clasificar el glifosato con una calificaci\u00f3n de 2A como &quot;probablemente cancer\u00edgeno&quot;.<\/p>\n<p>El informe completo de la IARC no se publicar\u00e1 hasta dentro de un a\u00f1o, pero mientras tanto, muchos se preguntan c\u00f3mo lleg\u00f3 la IARC a la conclusi\u00f3n de que, como dijo el Dr. Phil Miller, vicepresidente de asuntos regulatorios globales de Monsanto, \u201cest\u00e1 totalmente en desacuerdo con cada organismo cient\u00edfico &quot;.<\/p>\n<p>&quot;Es dif\u00edcil encontrar c\u00f3mo llegaron a esa conclusi\u00f3n cuando nadie m\u00e1s lo hizo&quot;, dijo el Dr. Keith Solomon, profesor em\u00e9rito de la Academia de Ciencias Toxicol\u00f3gicas de la Universidad de Guelph. <em>Farm Chemicals International<\/em>. Solomon, quien ha estado realizando estudios sobre toxicolog\u00eda de pesticidas desde 1978, dijo que uno de sus propios art\u00edculos publicados sobre la exposici\u00f3n al glifosato en Colombia fue malinterpretado por la IARC. \u201c(El glifosato) no es un compuesto trivial. Est\u00e1n generando mucha incertidumbre &quot;.<\/p>\n<p>Los ejecutivos de la industria agr\u00edcola enfatizaron que la IARC no es una autoridad reguladora y, como tal, no hay un impacto pr\u00e1ctico de la evaluaci\u00f3n.<\/p>\n<p>&quot;No vemos que esto afecte el estado regulatorio&quot;, dijo Brett Begemann, presidente y director de operaciones de Monsanto, en una conferencia telef\u00f3nica el martes. \u201cLas agencias reguladoras ya han llegado a la conclusi\u00f3n de que el glifosato es seguro para la salud humana y el medio ambiente. El BfR alem\u00e1n lleg\u00f3 a la misma conclusi\u00f3n hace meses con un producto que ha estado disponible durante 40 a\u00f1os \u201d.<\/p>\n<p>Begemann se refer\u00eda a la Agencia Alemana de Riesgos (BfR), que dijo en una reevaluaci\u00f3n en enero de 2015 que \u201clos datos disponibles no muestran propiedades cancer\u00edgenas o mutag\u00e9nicas del glifosato ni que el glifosato sea t\u00f3xico para la fertilidad, la reproducci\u00f3n o el desarrollo embrionario \/ fetal en animales de laboratorio \u201dy\u201c en estudios epidemiol\u00f3gicos en humanos, no hubo evidencia de carcinogenicidad y no hubo efectos sobre la fertilidad, reproducci\u00f3n y desarrollo de neurotoxicidad que pudieran atribuirse al glifosato \u201d.<\/p>\n<p>Un estudio clave entre muchos que la IARC desestim\u00f3 fue el plurianual, financiado por los contribuyentes <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/pubmed\/25635915\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Estudio de salud agr\u00edcola de EE. UU.<\/a>, que demostr\u00f3 que la exposici\u00f3n al glifosato en m\u00e1s de 57.000 aplicadores de pesticidas no se asoci\u00f3 con el c\u00e1ncer.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cFrancamente, el p\u00fablico merece saber por qu\u00e9 excluyeron los datos\u201d, dijo Miller.<\/p>\n<p><strong>\u00bfQu\u00e9 sigue?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>En la llamada, Miller inst\u00f3 a los pr\u00f3ximos pasos para la IARC, incluida la retractaci\u00f3n. &quot;Me gustar\u00eda que se retractaran de su declaraci\u00f3n y justificaran c\u00f3mo llegaron a su conclusi\u00f3n que difiere enormemente de los organismos reguladores de todo el mundo que han determinado que el glifosato es seguro para los seres humanos y el medio ambiente&quot;.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cHay m\u00e1s de 60 estudios de genotoxicidad sobre el glifosato y ninguno muestra resultados que deber\u00edan causar alarma en relaci\u00f3n con una posible exposici\u00f3n humana. Para los estudios epidemiol\u00f3gicos en humanos, hay siete estudios de cohortes y 14 estudios de casos y controles, ninguno de los cuales respalda la carcinogenicidad \u201d, dijo Sir Colin Berry, profesor em\u00e9rito de patolog\u00eda en la Universidad Queen Mary de Londres. Berry ha trabajado en varios organismos reguladores del Reino Unido, la Uni\u00f3n Europea y la OMS.<\/p>\n<p>La clasificaci\u00f3n de la IARC no solo se queda corta y contradice d\u00e9cadas de investigaci\u00f3n, dijo Begemann, sino que tambi\u00e9n tiene el potencial de confundir innecesariamente y causar alarma en el p\u00fablico, especialmente porque los consumidores a menudo se topan con publicaciones de grupos impulsados por la agenda en las redes sociales.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cLo que m\u00e1s me preocupa y realmente me decepciona es que esta informaci\u00f3n (se puede usar a prop\u00f3sito) para asustar e intimidar a las mam\u00e1s y pap\u00e1s que quieren saber que su comida es segura\u201d, dijo Begemann en la llamada.<\/p>\n<p>Un portavoz de CropLife International agreg\u00f3 que la IARC trabaja estrictamente en evaluaciones basadas en peligros, en lugar de evaluaciones basadas en riesgos, donde se eval\u00faan las propiedades intr\u00ednsecas de una sustancia. &quot;Esta es la raz\u00f3n por <span lang=\"EN-US\">el caf\u00e9, el aloa vera y el talco en polvo, por ejemplo, han sido clasificados por la IARC como &quot;posiblemente cancer\u00edgenos&quot;. Lo que la IARC no considera es el riesgo carcinog\u00e9nico real de estas sustancias, que es de bajo a inexistente \u201d.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>La IARC examinar\u00e1 m\u00e1s plaguicidas, incluidos algunos insecticidas organoclorados y algunos herbicidas clorfenoxi, en junio. La lista completa est\u00e1 disponible <a href=\"http:\/\/monographs.iarc.fr\/ENG\/Publications\/internrep\/14-002.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">aqu\u00ed<\/a>.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>La clasificaci\u00f3n como probable carcin\u00f3geno va en contra del consenso cient\u00edfico, dicen los expertos de la industria y los cient\u00edficos.<\/p>","protected":false},"author":72,"featured_media":53070,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[4,26,19],"tags":[54,170,135,583,653],"class_list":["post-53069","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-agrochemicals","category-americas","category-herbicides","tag-featured-home","tag-glyphosate","tag-monsanto","tag-regulatory","tag-who"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.7 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Monsanto Calls for Retraction of WHO\u2019s Glyphosate Assessment - AgriBusiness Global<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Classification as probable carcinogen goes against scientific consensus, industry experts and scientists say.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/es\/agrochemicals\/monsanto-calls-for-retraction-of-world-health-organizations-glyphosate-assessment\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"es_MX\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Monsanto Calls for Retraction of WHO\u2019s Glyphosate Assessment - AgriBusiness Global\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Classification as probable carcinogen goes against scientific consensus, industry experts and scientists say.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/es\/agrochemicals\/monsanto-calls-for-retraction-of-world-health-organizations-glyphosate-assessment\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"AgriBusiness Global\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2015-03-25T15:09:20+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-09-25T10:30:53+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/03\/16470924150_c4ca066cff_z.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"640\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"478\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Jackie Pucci\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/03\/16470924150_c4ca066cff_z.jpg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Escrito por\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Jackie Pucci\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Tiempo de lectura\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\\\/agrochemicals\\\/monsanto-calls-for-retraction-of-world-health-organizations-glyphosate-assessment\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\\\/agrochemicals\\\/monsanto-calls-for-retraction-of-world-health-organizations-glyphosate-assessment\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Jackie Pucci\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\\\/pt\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/1c6aa6d7370c670e1cdec6e0a547feec\"},\"headline\":\"Monsanto Calls for Retraction of WHO\u2019s Glyphosate Assessment\",\"datePublished\":\"2015-03-25T15:09:20+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-09-25T10:30:53+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\\\/agrochemicals\\\/monsanto-calls-for-retraction-of-world-health-organizations-glyphosate-assessment\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":726,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\\\/pt\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\\\/agrochemicals\\\/monsanto-calls-for-retraction-of-world-health-organizations-glyphosate-assessment\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2015\\\/03\\\/16470924150_c4ca066cff_z.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"featured-home\",\"glyphosate\",\"Monsanto\",\"regulatory\",\"WHO\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Agrochemicals\",\"Americas\",\"Herbicides\"],\"inLanguage\":\"es-MX\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\\\/agrochemicals\\\/monsanto-calls-for-retraction-of-world-health-organizations-glyphosate-assessment\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\\\/agrochemicals\\\/monsanto-calls-for-retraction-of-world-health-organizations-glyphosate-assessment\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\\\/agrochemicals\\\/monsanto-calls-for-retraction-of-world-health-organizations-glyphosate-assessment\\\/\",\"name\":\"Monsanto Calls for Retraction of WHO\u2019s Glyphosate Assessment - AgriBusiness Global\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\\\/pt\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\\\/agrochemicals\\\/monsanto-calls-for-retraction-of-world-health-organizations-glyphosate-assessment\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\\\/agrochemicals\\\/monsanto-calls-for-retraction-of-world-health-organizations-glyphosate-assessment\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2015\\\/03\\\/16470924150_c4ca066cff_z.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2015-03-25T15:09:20+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-09-25T10:30:53+00:00\",\"description\":\"Classification as probable carcinogen goes against scientific consensus, industry experts and scientists say.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\\\/agrochemicals\\\/monsanto-calls-for-retraction-of-world-health-organizations-glyphosate-assessment\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"es-MX\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\\\/agrochemicals\\\/monsanto-calls-for-retraction-of-world-health-organizations-glyphosate-assessment\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"es-MX\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\\\/agrochemicals\\\/monsanto-calls-for-retraction-of-world-health-organizations-glyphosate-assessment\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2015\\\/03\\\/16470924150_c4ca066cff_z.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2015\\\/03\\\/16470924150_c4ca066cff_z.jpg\",\"width\":640,\"height\":478,\"caption\":\"The Prop 65 listing would be based solely on erroneous IARC classification, would contradict agency\u2019s own 2007 assessment, and would defy scientific conclusions of U.S. EPA and regulators around the world, Monsanto says. Photo credit: Flickr user Mike Mozart, Creative Commons license\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\\\/agrochemicals\\\/monsanto-calls-for-retraction-of-world-health-organizations-glyphosate-assessment\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\\\/pt\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Monsanto Calls for Retraction of WHO\u2019s Glyphosate Assessment\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\\\/pt\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\\\/pt\\\/\",\"name\":\"AgriBusiness Global\",\"description\":\"Empowering Agriculture to Feed the World\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\\\/pt\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\\\/pt\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"es-MX\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\\\/pt\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"AgriBusiness Global\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\\\/pt\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"es-MX\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\\\/pt\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/d6kq167ddwbdq.cloudfront.net\\\/farmchemint\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/06\\\/ABG-logo-250x150px-01.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/d6kq167ddwbdq.cloudfront.net\\\/farmchemint\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/06\\\/ABG-logo-250x150px-01.png\",\"width\":251,\"height\":151,\"caption\":\"AgriBusiness Global\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\\\/pt\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\\\/pt\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/1c6aa6d7370c670e1cdec6e0a547feec\",\"name\":\"Jackie Pucci\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"es-MX\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/a4cf94eb8dc1f27084423a3b596864af07d406abcf684c9a772846cabe1c8592?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/a4cf94eb8dc1f27084423a3b596864af07d406abcf684c9a772846cabe1c8592?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/a4cf94eb8dc1f27084423a3b596864af07d406abcf684c9a772846cabe1c8592?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Jackie Pucci\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\\\/es\\\/author\\\/jackie-pucci\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Monsanto pide que se retire la evaluaci\u00f3n de glifosato de la OMS - AgriBusiness Global","description":"La clasificaci\u00f3n como probable carcin\u00f3geno va en contra del consenso cient\u00edfico, dicen los expertos de la industria y los cient\u00edficos.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/es\/agrochemicals\/monsanto-calls-for-retraction-of-world-health-organizations-glyphosate-assessment\/","og_locale":"es_MX","og_type":"article","og_title":"Monsanto Calls for Retraction of WHO\u2019s Glyphosate Assessment - AgriBusiness Global","og_description":"Classification as probable carcinogen goes against scientific consensus, industry experts and scientists say.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/es\/agrochemicals\/monsanto-calls-for-retraction-of-world-health-organizations-glyphosate-assessment\/","og_site_name":"AgriBusiness Global","article_published_time":"2015-03-25T15:09:20+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-09-25T10:30:53+00:00","og_image":[{"width":640,"height":478,"url":"https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/03\/16470924150_c4ca066cff_z.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Jackie Pucci","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_image":"https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/03\/16470924150_c4ca066cff_z.jpg","twitter_misc":{"Escrito por":"Jackie Pucci","Tiempo de lectura":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/agrochemicals\/monsanto-calls-for-retraction-of-world-health-organizations-glyphosate-assessment\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/agrochemicals\/monsanto-calls-for-retraction-of-world-health-organizations-glyphosate-assessment\/"},"author":{"name":"Jackie Pucci","@id":"https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/pt\/#\/schema\/person\/1c6aa6d7370c670e1cdec6e0a547feec"},"headline":"Monsanto Calls for Retraction of WHO\u2019s Glyphosate Assessment","datePublished":"2015-03-25T15:09:20+00:00","dateModified":"2019-09-25T10:30:53+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/agrochemicals\/monsanto-calls-for-retraction-of-world-health-organizations-glyphosate-assessment\/"},"wordCount":726,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/pt\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/agrochemicals\/monsanto-calls-for-retraction-of-world-health-organizations-glyphosate-assessment\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/03\/16470924150_c4ca066cff_z.jpg","keywords":["featured-home","glyphosate","Monsanto","regulatory","WHO"],"articleSection":["Agrochemicals","Americas","Herbicides"],"inLanguage":"es-MX","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/agrochemicals\/monsanto-calls-for-retraction-of-world-health-organizations-glyphosate-assessment\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/agrochemicals\/monsanto-calls-for-retraction-of-world-health-organizations-glyphosate-assessment\/","url":"https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/agrochemicals\/monsanto-calls-for-retraction-of-world-health-organizations-glyphosate-assessment\/","name":"Monsanto pide que se retire la evaluaci\u00f3n de glifosato de la OMS - AgriBusiness Global","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/pt\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/agrochemicals\/monsanto-calls-for-retraction-of-world-health-organizations-glyphosate-assessment\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/agrochemicals\/monsanto-calls-for-retraction-of-world-health-organizations-glyphosate-assessment\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/03\/16470924150_c4ca066cff_z.jpg","datePublished":"2015-03-25T15:09:20+00:00","dateModified":"2019-09-25T10:30:53+00:00","description":"La clasificaci\u00f3n como probable carcin\u00f3geno va en contra del consenso cient\u00edfico, dicen los expertos de la industria y los cient\u00edficos.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/agrochemicals\/monsanto-calls-for-retraction-of-world-health-organizations-glyphosate-assessment\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"es-MX","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/agrochemicals\/monsanto-calls-for-retraction-of-world-health-organizations-glyphosate-assessment\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"es-MX","@id":"https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/agrochemicals\/monsanto-calls-for-retraction-of-world-health-organizations-glyphosate-assessment\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/03\/16470924150_c4ca066cff_z.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/03\/16470924150_c4ca066cff_z.jpg","width":640,"height":478,"caption":"The Prop 65 listing would be based solely on erroneous IARC classification, would contradict agency\u2019s own 2007 assessment, and would defy scientific conclusions of U.S. EPA and regulators around the world, Monsanto says. Photo credit: Flickr user Mike Mozart, Creative Commons license"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/agrochemicals\/monsanto-calls-for-retraction-of-world-health-organizations-glyphosate-assessment\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/pt\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Monsanto Calls for Retraction of WHO\u2019s Glyphosate Assessment"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/pt\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/pt\/","name":"AgriBusiness Global","description":"Empoderar a la agricultura para alimentar al mundo","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/pt\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/pt\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"es-MX"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/pt\/#organization","name":"AgriBusiness Global","url":"https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/pt\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"es-MX","@id":"https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/pt\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/d6kq167ddwbdq.cloudfront.net\/farmchemint\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/ABG-logo-250x150px-01.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/d6kq167ddwbdq.cloudfront.net\/farmchemint\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/ABG-logo-250x150px-01.png","width":251,"height":151,"caption":"AgriBusiness Global"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/pt\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/pt\/#\/schema\/person\/1c6aa6d7370c670e1cdec6e0a547feec","name":"Jackie Pucci","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"es-MX","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a4cf94eb8dc1f27084423a3b596864af07d406abcf684c9a772846cabe1c8592?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a4cf94eb8dc1f27084423a3b596864af07d406abcf684c9a772846cabe1c8592?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a4cf94eb8dc1f27084423a3b596864af07d406abcf684c9a772846cabe1c8592?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Jackie Pucci"},"url":"https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/es\/author\/jackie-pucci\/"}]}},"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/03\/16470924150_c4ca066cff_z.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/53069","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/72"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=53069"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/53069\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/53070"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=53069"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=53069"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.agribusinessglobal.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=53069"}],"curies":[{"name":"gracias","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}