弥合生物学差距：从推广障碍到创新突破
2026 年 1 月 22 日 Biological products are increasingly viewed as one of agriculture’s most promising tools for addressing today’s complex challenges, including climate volatility, resistance management, soil health degradation, and growing sustainability demands. Yet despite significant investment and scientific progress, adoption of biologicals remains uneven across major agricultural regions. That disconnect was the focus of a recent 利用全球农业商业直播详细报道了印度的农用化学品有关情况。 网络研讨会, 注意生物学差距, where industry leaders examined why biologicals often struggle to gain traction — and what the industry is doing to change that.
The discussion revealed a clear problem-solution narrative: biologicals themselves are not falling short. Rather, the agricultural systems built around chemistry — how products are developed, evaluated, sold, and supported — are still adapting to the realities of living solutions.
The Problem: Structural Barriers Limit Adoption
One of the most cited barriers to biological adoption is inconsistent performance. Unlike synthetic chemicals, biologicals are living systems whose effectiveness depends heavily on environmental conditions, soil biology, and crop stress factors.
“You might have a product that performs incredibly well during drought stress, but it shows very little effect in cool, wet conditions,” said Dr. Nathan Kleczewski, Technical Product Lead for Biologicals at 先正达. “That’s not product failure — it’s just biology. And our systems aren’t always built to handle that nuance.”
- 手表: 注意生物学差距
This variability clashes with grower expectations shaped by decades of chemical use, where results are often predictable and linear. Biologicals demand a more contextual understanding, but many stakeholders lack the necessary training. Knowledge gaps among growers, consultants, and retailers continue to slow adoption.
“We need to deliver more technical information — not just on the active ingredients, but on formulations, compatibility, and how biologicals fit into growers’ normal programs,” said Dr. Sara Monteiro, Head of Global R&D Biocontrol and Adjuvants at Rovensa Next.
Operational challenges further complicate adoption. Biologicals often have shorter shelf lives, greater sensitivity to storage conditions, and batch-to-batch variability. Supply chains optimized for chemical products are not always equipped to support these needs.
“Consistency is a big question for growers,” said Dr. Willian Batista Silva, Technical Product Development Manager LATAM/CAC at 彩虹生物. “We increase confidence when we have stable, compatible formulations that fit seamlessly into existing farm practices.”
Misaligned expectations also play a role. Many biologicals require higher application rates, greater technical explanation, and more careful positioning as premium, performance-driven tools. “Biologicals have a different go-to-market model,” said Carlos Ledó, Founder and CEO of 素食. “But there’s a scarcity of trained talent to explain their proper use, and that creates friction at the farm level.”
The Solution: Trust, Education, and Integration
Despite these challenges, panelists emphasized that adoption barriers are being addressed through deliberate, practical strategies. Central to those efforts is trust.
“It all comes down to three levers: trust, education, and seamless integration,” said Dr. Brooks Coetzee, Biologicals Business Partner at 科迪华. “If growers can see real results and easily integrate products into their operations, adoption will follow.”
Demonstration is a powerful trust-builder. Clear labeling, precise claims, and large-scale demo plots allow growers to see how biologicals perform under real conditions. Side-by-side trials and localized data help reset expectations and replace uncertainty with experience.
Integration is equally critical. Rather than positioning biologicals as standalone replacements for chemistry, companies are embedding them into broader crop management programs. Rovensa Next’s approach, for example, combines biostimulants, biocontrols, and fertilizers into unified systems validated through partnerships with universities and grower organizations.
“By integrating our solutions and validating them through strong partnerships, we create programs that growers can trust and adopt more easily,” Monteiro said.
Formulation and usability also matter. Products designed to fit existing spray schedules, tank mixes, and logistics reduce friction and increase confidence. “Our goal is to make biologicals easy to use without forcing growers to change how they farm,” Batista Silva said.
R&D Responds: Rebuilding the Discovery Engine
Behind the scenes, biological gaps are also reshaping agricultural research and development. Discovery engines built for chemical actives struggle to evaluate living organisms and their complex interactions.
“The effects of biologicals are nuanced and complex,” Kleczewski said. “Traditional screens just aren’t sufficient.”
As a result, companies are investing in new R&D models that integrate genomics, artificial intelligence, gene editing, and systems-based risk assessment. Partnerships, acquisitions, and venture investments are accelerating access to innovation.
Formulation science and technical validation have become central R&D priorities. “Biocontrol products require a lot more technical understanding and specialized application,” Monteiro noted, emphasizing reproducibility and batch consistency.
Coetzee framed the shift more broadly: biologicals are no longer peripheral. “They address problems farmers face worldwide and are underutilized as tools to improve productivity, yield, and quality,” he said.
From Gap to Growth Opportunity
The consensus from 注意生物学差距 was clear: biological gaps are not signs of failure, but signals of transition. By rebuilding trust, improving education, integrating solutions, and modernizing R&D, the industry is transforming biologicals from a promising concept into a reliable, scalable tool.
The opportunity ahead is significant. Align biology with real-world farming, support it with modern discovery engines, and deliver it through systems growers understand — and biologicals can play a defining role in the future of global agriculture.
- 手表: 注意生物学差距
立即获取时事通讯！
