Strategic R&D Management in the Global Crop Protection Industry (Part 2)

Editor’s note: This is the second of seven articles in a series on Strategic R&D Management in AgChem and BioScience to be published on For a full list of the articles, click here.

In the crop protection industry, Research and Development (R&D) of new active ingredients, optimization of product portfolios, and the introduction of innovative crop protection strategies are a necessity to ensure the provision of enough crop resources to meet the increasing needs of the world’s population, as well as enabling proactive responses to technology change, competition, and changing customer demands.

“You can’t just ask customers what they want and then try to give that to them. By the time you get it built, they’ll want something new.” — Steve Jobs

Strategic R&D Management prioritizes the integration of R&D with corporate and business objectives, while ensuring compliance with conventional Project Management parameters, such as budgets and performance indicators.

R&D Management

R&D management enables organizations to respond to external or internal opportunities, and to introduce new strategies, processes, or products.

Figure 1: Summary of R&D management activities.
Figure 1: Summary of R&D management activities.

R&D management may be described as the process of designing R&D strategies, managing technical expertise (creation and retention) and innovation (creation and commercialization), the leading of talent teams, and the transfer of knowledge and innovation within the company or network (Figure 1).

Strategic R&D management activities may include basic and applied research management, technical, product, and process development management, talent management, and strategic management, as well as IP and innovation management.

R&D Management vs. Project Management

One of the main objectives of R&D management is to ensure that projects are completed successfully and within the defined timeframes and budgets — a basic tenet of conventional Project Management.

As for any management system, basic parameters such as budget and performance requirements need to be managed with an appropriate level of discipline.

This is especially true for managing R&D teams and projects, where scientists may have a tendency to focus on the process more than on the needs of the customer.

However, due to the nature and complexity of R&D, and the need to provide an environment conducive to ongoing iteration (the implementation of experimental learning into the redesign of new trials) and innovation, the rigid application of conventional project management frameworks risks creating barriers to innovation.

For R&D projects, dedicated R&D management models are needed, capable of adhering to the need for efficiency and discipline while ensuring enough freedom for innovation processes.

R&D and Strategic R&D Management Models

R&D and Strategic R&D Management models may be described in terms of maturity: so-called first, second, and third generation R&D Management models have the objective of creating and disseminating scientific knowledge and innovation internally within the organization (endogenous focus) while fourth generation models introduce the concept of globalized generation of intellectual capital through collaboration across organizations (exogenous focus).

In first-generation R&D Management models, the objective is to facilitate scientific discovery with emphasis on the scientific intuition of the individual researchers. Project funding and prioritization is governed by perceived scientific value (science “push”) and budget, rather than strategic parameters (market “pull”).

In these systems, researchers may operate with considerable autonomy and first-generation R&D Management models are often characterized by flexibility in timelines, budgets, and prioritization — often with low accountability.

Second-generation R&D Management models may be considered an extension of first-generation management models and adopt a more market-orientated strategy for prioritization.

Standard Project Management frameworks (such as key performance indicators, output-based KPIs, and binary “gated” decision-making processes) are typically used on a project-by-project basis to ensure accountability and compliance with budgets and timelines.

With the emergence of increasingly large crop protection corporations, the need arose for strategic management models capable of facilitating the interaction between R&D and Business units, to ensure a strategically balanced product portfolio.

Accordingly, third-generation R&D Management models are portfolio orientated, driven by business strategy, and prioritize the integration of R&D with corporate and business objectives.

To ensure compliance with strategic objectives, dedicated R&D Management techniques (such as Iterative Gate processes and Inclusive Management Frameworks — see Chapter 8) are typically implemented.

Increasing globalization, including acquisitions, collaborations, and licensing agreements, challenge existing R&D Management models with respect to exogenous activities outside the organisation. In the current consolidation climate, significant opportunities arise outside traditional endogenous company restraints.

Figure 2: Summary of R&D management models.
Figure 2: Summary of R&D management models.

In a world of globally distributed knowledge, companies are no longer able to rely entirely on their own research, but are increasingly dependent on networking as a source of innovation.

Global acquisitions, collaboration, and licensing agreements increasingly require global R&D Management strategies, which may be described as the process of designing R&D strategies and processes across multi-cultural and multi-lingual settings.

To utilize these opportunities, global corporations are increasingly making use of fourth-generation R&D management models, with the objective of generating intellectual capital through external collaborations.

These fourth-generation models are network-orientated and driven by collaborative innovation.

In addition to existing Project Management and Strategic R&D Management techniques, strategic innovation and knowledge management methods may be implemented to ensure the synergistic integration of R&D strategies across organizations, cultures and fields of scientific endeavor.

For globally orientated organizations, fourth-generation R&D Management models utilize the advantages of collaborative innovation, including synergism between internal and external R&D teams, the reduced cost of conducting research and development, and shared market research and market reach.

In addition to the need to train scientists and managers in cross-cultural communication, fourth-generation models and the globalization of R&D Management may require additional considerations, such as:

  • the post-merger integration (or dissolution) of R&D groups, as well as decisions regarding their location or relocation;
  • the realignment of innovation strategies;
  • the introduction of R&D networks and virtual R&D Management systems;
  • the transfer of technology and the sharing (and retention) of expertise; and
  • the introduction of cross-cultural R&D innovation and performance index parameters.

All the described R&D management models have the objective of improving R&D performance and productivity, providing structure to the R&D process, and ensuring a R&D environment in which the complexity of R&D can be managed.

Through the application of dedicated management models, R&D Management is crucial for the design of R&D strategies, the management of technical expertise and innovation, the leading of talent teams, and the transfer of knowledge and innovation within the company or network.

Thanks for reading. Please feel free to read and share my other articles.

If you found this article interesting, you will find more useful information in STRATEGIC R&D MANAGEMENT: AGCHEM & BIOSCIENCE by Harry Teicher. Aimed at managers, researchers, and others wishing to understand basic strategic aspects of Crop Protection, this book is an easily accessible introduction to essential principles of Strategic R&D Management.

For more information, visit BIOSCIENCE SOLUTIONS – contributing to the development of sustainable Crop Protection solutions by providing independent Strategic R&D Management and Scientific support to AgChem and BioSolutions Businesses developing science-based products.


Leave a Reply



What to Expect for U.S. Dicamba Use in 2019

Long-awaited news from U.S. Environmental Protection Agency on its decision to extend the registration for the new dicamba technologies arrived Halloween


Bayer: Study Shows its Soybeans Reduce Environmental Impact

Results from a five-year peer-reviewed study on Intacta RR2 PRO™ soybeans planted in South America were recently published, indicating that


A Salute to Retired CropLife America President Jay Vroom

Editor’s note: It goes without saying that crop protection manufacturing is a central point of interest to readers of this


Expect Herbicide Price Hikes in 2019

Herbicide price hikes across the board are an inevitability for 2019, as the entire U.S. ag community deals with a


Corteva to Launch New Fungicide, Starting in Asia Pacific

Corteva Agriscience announced Adavelt active as the new brand name for a novel fungicide that will offer farmers curative and


Albaugh Discusses 2018 Trials of CoAXium Wheat System

Albaugh announced that the CoAXium Wheat Production System driven by Aggressor herbicide exceeded expectations in 2018 performance evaluation trials, demonstrating


FMC Launches Insecticide/Fungicide

FMC Corp. has launched Ethos 3D insecticide/fungicide, formulated specifically for the novel 3RIVE 3D in-furrow application system that converts traditional


The U.S. Battle over Glyphosate Has ‘Old World’ Roots

Although it’s been in use since 1974, glyphosate has come under intense attack here in the U.S. just recently, writes

Africa/Middle East

Kenya’s Crop Protection Industry Fears ‘Dire Consequences’ of New Pesticides Tax

The agrichemcials industry in Kenya is up in arms over a decision by the government to impose a 16% value-added


U.S. EPA Renews Dicamba Label, with New Restrictions

Long-awaited news from U.S. EPA came on the evening of Oct. 31 that it has decided to renew the label


ADAMA Hit by Drought in Europe, Higher Sourcing Costs

Shortage in certain raw materials and intermediates, mostly owing to increased environmental focus in China, led to higher procurement costs


Belchim Crop Protection: Reevaluating Sourcing

Belchim Crop Protection began hearing rumblings about China’s crackdown on manufacturers violating environmental regulations and potential supply disruptions in late


HELM Agro Fungicide Approved in California

HELM Agro US, Inc. announced that the California Department of Pesticide Regulations (CDPR) has approved Helmstar Plus SC fungicide for


Fungicide Use on the Rise in Indonesia

The global crop protection market in 2017 increased at a rate of 1.9% in nominal terms over that of 2016.


Crop Protection Tariffs Webinar: Understanding the Impact

The Trump Administration’s tariff strategy is straining business operations in the crop protection market. It has imposed a 10% tariff


Mahindra, Sumitomo Ink Crop Protection JV

Mahindra and Sumitomo Corporation will have a 60 percent and 40 percent stake, respectively.


BASF Launches Revysol Fungicide in South Korea

With the first global regulatory approval for the new compound received from South Korean authorities earlier this year, farmers in the country will be among the first in the world to benefit from the company’s latest offering.


Agrichemicals: The Politics of Channel Management

Editor’s note: This article was originally published on LinkedIn. Many years ago, there used to be a notorious gang of


Willowood USA to Hike Prices on Tariffs

Willowood the latest U.S. agrichemical company to announce price hikes.

Latest News


Terramera Gets EPA Approval for Biocontrol Product

Terramera announced the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency approved registration of its novel, broad-spectrum agricultural insect, fungal disease, and mite control

Industry News

Cibus Files Registration Statement for Proposed Initial Public Offering

Cibus Ltd., a leader in advanced plant-breeding technologies, has publicly filed a registration statement on Form S-1 with the U.S.


What to Expect for U.S. Dicamba Use in 2019

Long-awaited news from U.S. Environmental Protection Agency on its decision to extend the registration for the new dicamba technologies arrived Halloween


Report: Farming in 20% of Indian Districts Threatened by Climate Change

Crops, plantations, even livestock in 151 districts, or slightly more than one-fifth of the total districts in India, are susceptible


Bayer: Study Shows its Soybeans Reduce Environmental Impact

Results from a five-year peer-reviewed study on Intacta RR2 PRO™ soybeans planted in South America were recently published, indicating that