Suphur Mills Ltd. to Expand in Newer Formulations, Biologicals

Bimal Shah, Director, describes ambitious plans for the company and his thoughts on distribution, the educational process, and Make in India. Shah sat down with AgriBusiness Global at the AgriBusiness Global Trade Summit in Las Vegas on Aug. 7.

Read more of the India Report in our upcoming September/October issue of AgriBusiness Global.

Sulphur mills is obviously known for its namesake product, sulphur, along with the traditional range of agrichemicals. Can you talk about your plans to expand in biologicals?

We don’t see biologicals as a 100% complete solution to (replacing) agrichemicals, but definitely the market is increasing. Of course, bios have a problem with shelf-life and longevity of the product, which we’re trying to address through our formulation technologies. We are not commercializing yet, but I do see in a year or so we should be launching a biological range of products, starting in India and then through the rest of the world.

What are the product types, and why now?

Some of them have IP protection so not going to get into specifics, but we’re trying better solutions that can almost replace fungicides or insecticides that are being used, and also be classified organic. These are biocontrols.

We are now putting time and emphasis into getting into this area because we are spread out over (conventional) agrichemicals, so we thought this was a line we needed to re-think. We have some innovative things we have done that have looked very good at lab-scale, so we can see how we can grow the size economically.

It seems to be a logical move with sulphur being your hallmark product.

We are the largest sulphur fungicide manufacturer in India. In the world we are No. 3 in this particular formulation, which is an 80%-solution fungicide or miticide used mainly in grapes and fruits and vegetables. Apart from that, there is another sulphur formulation we introduced, which is a 90% formulation, and we were the first to come to market with that around the end of 2007-08. That product works at one-fifth the dose compared to a normal sulphur. This is an organic soil sulphur that works as a fertilizer, and we are now selling around 18,000 to 20,000 tonnes in India alone. We see further growth in India, as we have 300 to 400 field people who are promoting this day in and day out. Everybody knows sulphur, but until they use it, they don’t see it and therefore don’t see a return.

How does distribution work in India?

The manufacturing happens in our plant, then the product goes to our 40 warehouses. Each warehouse has 10 or 12 people associated with sales or marketing around each particular location. We have a 10,000-dealer network, but the sizes the dealers cover are small. There is a product development team that goes to farm- and dealer-level explaining what the product is. At the farm level, there are small demonstration trials showing side-by-side comparisons of product performance.

How would you describe the educational process?

It takes a lot of work and needs a lot of push and commitment. Once the farmer is convinced, the commercial or pricing is not a worry because he’s happy with the success. What we’re trying to give to the farmer is a product per kilo, but something that gets him a return on his investment for his harvest. Yield is one thing. Other catalyst we are changing in the crop space is the application seen in various products. Not a single crop doesn’t use this product. Sulphur is non-toxic and organic. We’ve come with different variants and newer formulations mixed with other nutrients which is going to grow the Sulphur base position in our portfolio.

What about new investments in facilities?

We have grown quite a lot. A couple of years back we were back at 25,000 to 30,000 tonnes of WG formulations. Now this year we should be at 60,000 to 70,000 tonnes and by the end of 2019, 100,000 tonnes.

Everything is made, formulated, and packed in India, and shipped to the 80 countries we operate in. In certain geographies there is more push. We have enough IP now gained in the formulation technology space to further expand.

In what markets are you focusing on more heavily?

South America is important. The market is big but of course the risks are also, with getting the money back around the distribution channels. The U.S. market is tricky, but we’re there. Distribution is a challenge.

There aren’t other companies in the world making the same high-end formulations we are.

What makes the U.S. trickier?

Distribution. It’s getting more fragmented. Earlier it was controlled by the top five, but I’ve been hearing there is less control now with smaller players coming into the space. The whole rebate system with the multinationals is also tricky. Here, you may have gold in you product and it won’t sell. The whole pull comes from the end-user, the farmer. You can talk to the head office but if his guys don’t want the product, the stores don’t want the product. Australia works similarly.

What is your perspective on Make in India?

I think it’s good in ways, but it may have been done a bit abruptly. What was happening was there was a lot dumping of bad-quality product. China is cheaper – that may be true, but quality was going down. There was no reliability or emphasis on quality first, and that was being taken for granted. A lot of material was coming and based on that they were having economies of scale. Now we’re seeing China changing too because of pollution; India was already having those issues and we’re trying to control that. So they said, whatever can be made in India should be made in India. There will be a gap in supply and demand. But they will look for alternatives.

Sometimes in a culture like India I feel crazy things could happen. If there’s a bigger barrier, people will try to jump over it even more. A lot of companies in India had a lot of manufacturing capacity and we didn’t even realize (the potential), because the Chinese government is giving a 15% rebate on what he is selling. In India you’re not going to get a rebate, so how is the Indian manufacturer ever going to be competitive? It could be the other way around – that a duty would be imposed on imports. They did the same thing with the car industry by imposing a 225% duty, but that’s how Tata became so strong.

But the automotive industry is not a necessity. Farming is a necessity, so you need to have more openness. I would prefer it if they would just increase the duty on the imports. On the other hand, if you put more barriers, cost, and requirements on the registrations, serious people are more apt to be in the business.

I’m fine with Make in India, but it has to be done in pace. Give the benefit to India.

Here’s an example: cartap. In India, there are probably 20 import registrations for cartap. Out of these, there are 17 or 18 who have a manufacturing registration (in addition to the import registration) – whether they make it or have ever made it is another point. There are one or two who can really make it. All of the product has still been imported thus far. But do these companies that have the manufacturing registration have the capacity? It will take time.


Leave a Reply



What to Do If You Have Products Subject to New U.S. Tariffs

The new retaliation lists hit almost every product that the Chinese import from the U.S.


Bayer Outlines Vision for Future for Ag

The company intends to broadly launch FarmRise in India in 2019, with additional expansion plans in the future for Asia, Africa and South America.


How Higher Tier Testing Would Answer the Neonicotinoid Question

Fera Science has built Europe’s largest free flow mesocosm to test the impact crop protection chemicals like pesticides and biocides have on aquatic ecosystems.


Should Agri-Input Manufacturers Outsource E-Commerce to Startups?

Editor’s note: This article was originally published on LinkedIn. Now, when we work with this question, depending on where the


Glyphosate Still Under Threat in Brazil – Report

Brazil's farmers will face higher costs if they are forced to procure substitute herbicides.


HELM Agro U.S. Launches New Line of Fearless Herbicides

HELM Agro US, Inc. has received EPA registration for FEARLESS and FEARLESS XTRA herbicides, two acetochlor-based weed control tools for

Figure 1: Summary of R&D management activities.

Strategic R&D Management in the Global Crop Protection Industry (Part 2)

Editor’s note: This is the second of seven articles in a series on Strategic R&D Management in AgChem and BioScience


Brazilian Court Overturns Glyphosate Ban

Judge based ruling on government's argument that the ban could harm Brazil's economy.


With California Glyphosate Verdict, Full-Blown Chemical Warfare Has Started

God, I sometimes hate being right. Frequent readers of this column might remember that not too many months back I predicted that, since things seemed to be going pretty good for crop protection products in terms of sales, market opponents would begin redoubling their efforts to “take down” this segment in any way possible.


BASF Launches Credenz with LibertyLink GT27

It allows growers to apply both Liberty herbicide and glyphosate over the top of soybeans for post-emergence control of broadleaf and grass weeds.


Hedge Hurts ADAMA Profit, While Sales Rise

The past two quarters have seen the beginnings of a recovery in demand for crop protection products in many markets, despite ongoing low soft commodity prices and farmer income.


CropLife Ghana Trains Regulatory Officials on Detection of Sub-standard Agrichemicals

Security officers, including police, customs officers, and other regulatory agents in the country have attended a day’s workshop on identifying


The Verdict on Dicamba in the U.S., Year Two

Was year two of the new dicamba technologies in the United States a success?


Yield10 Bioscience Signs Research License Agreement the Broad Institute and Pioneer

 Yield10 Bioscience Inc., a company developing new technologies to create step-change improvements in crop yield to enhance global food security,


Sourcing Agchem from China: An Outlook that Demands Strategic Planning

C S Liew, Pacific Agriscience Pte Ltd, Singapore, examines the repercussions of the Chinese environmental crackdown and sourcing at the 2018 Trade Summit held in Phoenix, Arizona.


Atticus Adds Depth with New Staff Members

Atticus welcomes six new members to its growing team of talent.


Is India a Future Manufacturing Hub for Agrichemicals?

The changing scenario in global trade has made a significant impact on agrichemical business in India. Although the country is


Vive Introduces Five New Crop Protection Products for 2019 Season

Five new fertilizer-compatible products are expected to be available from Vive Crop Protection for U.S. corn, sugarbeet, and potato growers


Vive Announces Five Crop Protection Products for 2019

New nanotechnology-enabled products provide proven insect or disease control.

Latest News


Trump Trade War Divides Farming World as China Demand Shifts

Soybeans have become something of a poster child for the U.S.-China trade war, with everyone from Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin


India Could Fill Gap in Agricultural Imports Amid China-U.S. Trade War

The ongoing China-U.S. trade dispute will provide a chance for China and India to strengthen their agricultural trade, which will

Industry News

Escalating Trade War with China Will Increase Damage to American Soybean Farmers

The Administration’s decision to impose 10% tariffs on an additional $200 billion in Chinese imports — and China’s subsequent retaliation

Plant Health

Favorable Soil pH: Does it Really Increase Nutrient Use Efficiency?

More than ever agriculture needs to follow principles of sustainability that ensure build up and maintenance of long-term soil productivity,

Plant Health

Diagnosing and Mapping the Need for Soil Improvement in Brazil

Brazil has lacked the data for creating a soil fertility survey that could be used for assessing if any nutritional