Biopesticides: Assessing the Opportunities and Challenges in R&D, Formulation

Editor’s note: Dr. Harry Teicher, an independent Strategic R&D consultant with over 20-plus years of AgChem and BioScience R&D Management and Support Experience, assesses the current opportunities and challenges in the biopesticide market as they relate to R&D, formulation and application, and grower adoption and perception.



Research centers around the world are undertaking research to improve techniques for the development and application of biopesticides to enhance their commercial feasibility.

Start-ups and other smaller, innovative companies have created a powerful and competitive environment for biopesticide R&D.
Acquisitions, collaborations, and licensing agreements bear witness to the ongoing symbiosis in the crop protection market, and the need for inclusive Strategic R&D Management frameworks, as well as the mediation of biology-based strategies to decision-makers, is greater than ever before.

Currently, focus is on innovation at the interface between chemical and biological crop protection, precision technology, and plant biology.

Other technological developments include the integration of “big data” into pest management, including crowd-scouting by farmers and the increasing use of degree-day models for pest and pathogen prediction.

Ongoing legislation amendments to make the regulatory process appropriate for biopesticides facilitate the development and introduction of sustainable, non-chemical alternatives to pesticides, advancing the use of biopesticides in the EU. Further harmonization between Member States will accelerate regional acceptance of biopesticidal strategies.


Low financial incentives (return on investment) on the part of the incumbent crop protection industry restrict the adoption of minor-crop biopesticidal products.

There is increasing awareness of natural plant toxins, which may be produced through the induction of plant defense responses by biopesticides.

Regional exemptions from residual tolerance levels hinders global trade to regions with maximum residue levels in food (such as the EU), reducing the potential economic viability of new biopesticides and thus their introduction into global crop protection strategies.

The cost of R&D registration and introduction can preclude standalone small companies entering the market.

Start-ups and other smaller, innovative companies face further challenges in competing with incumbent agrichemical technologies, when attempting to convince risk-averse growers to transition to this emerging technology, but also with respect to the economic requirements for efficacy testing, registration, and distribution.

Corporate IP policies further inhibit collaboration with agtech startups — incumbent corporations tend toward in-house development and innovation, often preferring acquisition rather than collaboration.

For corporations, acquisitions may lead to R&D funds becoming too diluted for them to prioritize true product innovation and strategic vision.

The inclusion of expert biological knowledge into R&D and business strategies is still not optimal. For current industry leaders in strategic growth and change, priority should continue to be given to developing Strategic R&D Management frameworks for leading innovation growth.



The trend in conventional and biopesticide formulation is to move away from wettable powders and suspension concentrates to water dispersible granules, and from dusts to granules.

Controlled release formulations are being developed to optimize effect, while nanotechnology is expected to provide new types of formulations such as nanoemulsions, nanosuspensions, and nanocapsule formulations.

Another area of focus is the choice of appropriate adjuvants for optimal biopesticidal activity. Here, collaboration between biologists and chemists is facilitating the development and introduction of new formulations and applications, reducing the inconsistency of field performance and encouraging growers to implement this new technology.

Current research efforts in bioformulation technology are focused on delivery and application practices, especially on understanding the impact of plant defense induction kinetics on application timing and placement of the formulated product.


Until recently, slow progress in formulation and delivery research has been a major hurdle to biopesticide development and acceptance.

There are significant costs involved in solving the biological issues of biopesticide formulations (including storage and field stability as well efficacy consistency), and these can preclude standalone small companies entering the market.

However, formulation is one of the key factors in determining the commercial success of a biopesticide candidate, and the benefits in terms of market access and the acceptance of biopesticides as viable commercial alternatives or supplements to conventional plant protection products suffice to warrant this effort.



The current model of relying almost exclusively on synthetic chemicals is changing.

Biopesticides present unique and complex modes of action and agronomic practices. Most agricultural biopesticides are suited for incorporation into IPM programmes, in conjunction with traditional pesticides which, in turn, is contributing to the rapid increase in use of biopesticides.

Today more and better biological active ingredients and products are available that can compete with, as well as complement conventional chemical pesticides. Demand, too, is driven by our increased knowledge about biopesticides mode of action and refined application rates and methods.


Currently, biopesticides may demand higher unit prices compared to chemical pesticides, in part due to economies of scale, and the associated limited product availability is a further restraint to the growth in acceptance of biopesticides. On the other hand, locally produced biopesticides may be less costly than conventional, chemical pesticides.

There is a perception of lower and variable efficacy, shorter persistence, and greater dependence on environmental conditions on the part of end users.

Too often growers experience the frustration of inconsistent efficacy following the application of biologicals when disease pressures are already too high. When applied with due regard for factors such as plant-response kinetics and disease pressure development, these same products prove to be highly efficacious.

Currently, reports of inconsistent efficacy lead to either over-optimism or skepticism on the part of marketers, corporate decision makers, and farmers alike.

Biopesticides require knowledge-intensive management systems to develop and use them effectively. Crop protection biologists have a unique responsibility to mediate an understanding of the drivers of biopesticide efficacy, and to ensure innovation- and knowledge dissemination in the development and implementation of commercial strategies.

An increasing willingness to invest in field testing by agrichemical majors is addressing the perception of low efficacy and greater variability for biopesticides. However, start-ups and other smaller, innovative companies may not have funds for extensive demonstration trials and customer education.

Leave a Reply



FMC Launches Insecticide/Fungicide

FMC Corp. has launched Ethos 3D insecticide/fungicide, formulated specifically for the novel 3RIVE 3D in-furrow application system that converts traditional


Marrone in Distribution Deal with Input Supplier in Turkey

Marrone Bio Innovations, Inc., a leading global provider of bio-based pest management and plant health products, announced that it has


How the Biopesticide and SMART-TECH Industries Create a “Blue Ocean” of Uncontested Crop Protection Market Space (Part 4)

Editor’s note: This is the fourth of seven articles in a series on Strategic R&D Management in AgChem and BioScience


Bayer Biological Product Registered in France

Bayer said its Serenade ASO fungicide/bactericide has received registration in France for foliar and soil applications on a wide range


Bayer Seeking Biologicals Partnerships

Bayer says it is seeking partners as it looks to increase its presence in the biologicals market. The company is

Wheat field

How ‘Softer Chemistry’ in Crop Protection Addresses Increased Emphasis on Safety

With the recent implementation of the Food Safety Modernization Act, a spotlight is now being shone on the need for

Pam Marrone

Marrone Enters Distribution Partnership in Vietnam, Cambodia

Key factors driving the rapid adoption of biologicals in Vietnam include pesticide residue problems in agro-products for local consumption, new requirements for Maximum Residue Levels on agro-products imported to the EU and U.S., and a growing number of banned pesticides.


STK REGEV Biofungicide Now Registered in Argentina

STK bio-ag technologies, the innovative Israeli-based leader in bio-ag technologies for sustainable crop protection and aquaculture, has announced its ‘hybrid’


BioConsortia Promotes Dr. Hong Zhu to Sr. VP of Research and Development

BioConsortia, Inc., innovator of microbial solutions for natural plant trait enhancement and yield improvement, has promoted Dr. Hong Zhu to


Marrone Bio Innovations Submits Novel Bioherbicide for EPA Approval

Marrone Bio Innovations, Inc. (MBI), a leading provider of bio-based pest management and plant health products for the agriculture, turf


PepsiCo in Deal with Arysta LifeScience Chile on Biological Products

Under the agreement, the select group of Chilean potato farmers that supplies PepsiCo on an exclusive basis will use the solutions from the Arysta LifeScience Pronutiva program, which combines traditional crop protection inputs with biological solutions.


Biorational Processes in Biopesticide Discovery and Development

Agchem companies are expanding their biopesticide R&D and portfolios, driven by stricter pesticide regulatory requirements, consumer awareness regarding hazards caused


3 Questions with BioTecnologie BT’s Piffanelli on EU Regulatory Environment

BioTecnologie BT is a Perugia, Italy-based contract research organization (CRO) specialized in the regulatory testing of biopesticides and biostimulants.


Corbion CEO Tjerk de Ruiter Appointed as New EuropaBio Chairman

EuropaBio’s Executive Board and General Assembly of Members confirmed the appointment of Tjerk de Ruiter as Chairman of the association.


FaunaSmart, BioScience Solutions Form Innovative Collaboration in Crop Protection

FaunaSmart and BioScience Solutions have announced a cooperation within strategic business development and innovation strategies in crop protection. Harry Teicher,


FMC, Chr. Hansen Extend Collaboration on Natural Crop Protection

FMC Corp. and Chr. Hansen have announced a five-year extension of their collaboration to develop and commercialize natural solutions for the agricultural industry.


Tradecorp Acquires Spain’s Idai Nature

Idai Nature is currently present in 35 countries and has posted annual growth of more than 30% in recent years. The company’s consolidated revenues amount to 16 million euros.


A (Surprisingly Long) Biopesticide Timeline

The application of biopesticides in plant protection is certainly not a new innovation. A few examples are presented in the


Marrone Bio Innovations Names Hammill as Chief Commercial Officer

Most recently, Hammill was Chief Operating Officer at Pivot Bio, a startup company.

Latest News

Industry News

Cibus Files Registration Statement for Proposed Initial Public Offering

Cibus Ltd., a leader in advanced plant-breeding technologies, has publicly filed a registration statement on Form S-1 with the U.S.


What to Expect for U.S. Dicamba Use in 2019

Long-awaited news from U.S. Environmental Protection Agency on its decision to extend the registration for the new dicamba technologies arrived Halloween


Report: Farming in 20% of Indian Districts Threatened by Climate Change

Crops, plantations, even livestock in 151 districts, or slightly more than one-fifth of the total districts in India, are susceptible


Bayer: Study Shows its Soybeans Reduce Environmental Impact

Results from a five-year peer-reviewed study on Intacta RR2 PRO™ soybeans planted in South America were recently published, indicating that


A Salute to Retired CropLife America President Jay Vroom

Editor’s note: It goes without saying that crop protection manufacturing is a central point of interest to readers of this