Biopesticides: Assessing the Opportunities and Challenges in R&D, Formulation

Editor’s note: Dr. Harry Teicher, an independent Strategic R&D consultant with over 20-plus years of AgChem and BioScience R&D Management and Support Experience, assesses the current opportunities and challenges in the biopesticide market as they relate to R&D, formulation and application, and grower adoption and perception.



Research centers around the world are undertaking research to improve techniques for the development and application of biopesticides to enhance their commercial feasibility.

Start-ups and other smaller, innovative companies have created a powerful and competitive environment for biopesticide R&D.
Acquisitions, collaborations, and licensing agreements bear witness to the ongoing symbiosis in the crop protection market, and the need for inclusive Strategic R&D Management frameworks, as well as the mediation of biology-based strategies to decision-makers, is greater than ever before.

Currently, focus is on innovation at the interface between chemical and biological crop protection, precision technology, and plant biology.

Other technological developments include the integration of “big data” into pest management, including crowd-scouting by farmers and the increasing use of degree-day models for pest and pathogen prediction.

Ongoing legislation amendments to make the regulatory process appropriate for biopesticides facilitate the development and introduction of sustainable, non-chemical alternatives to pesticides, advancing the use of biopesticides in the EU. Further harmonization between Member States will accelerate regional acceptance of biopesticidal strategies.


Low financial incentives (return on investment) on the part of the incumbent crop protection industry restrict the adoption of minor-crop biopesticidal products.

There is increasing awareness of natural plant toxins, which may be produced through the induction of plant defense responses by biopesticides.

Regional exemptions from residual tolerance levels hinders global trade to regions with maximum residue levels in food (such as the EU), reducing the potential economic viability of new biopesticides and thus their introduction into global crop protection strategies.

The cost of R&D registration and introduction can preclude standalone small companies entering the market.

Start-ups and other smaller, innovative companies face further challenges in competing with incumbent agrichemical technologies, when attempting to convince risk-averse growers to transition to this emerging technology, but also with respect to the economic requirements for efficacy testing, registration, and distribution.

Corporate IP policies further inhibit collaboration with agtech startups — incumbent corporations tend toward in-house development and innovation, often preferring acquisition rather than collaboration.

For corporations, acquisitions may lead to R&D funds becoming too diluted for them to prioritize true product innovation and strategic vision.

The inclusion of expert biological knowledge into R&D and business strategies is still not optimal. For current industry leaders in strategic growth and change, priority should continue to be given to developing Strategic R&D Management frameworks for leading innovation growth.



The trend in conventional and biopesticide formulation is to move away from wettable powders and suspension concentrates to water dispersible granules, and from dusts to granules.

Controlled release formulations are being developed to optimize effect, while nanotechnology is expected to provide new types of formulations such as nanoemulsions, nanosuspensions, and nanocapsule formulations.

Another area of focus is the choice of appropriate adjuvants for optimal biopesticidal activity. Here, collaboration between biologists and chemists is facilitating the development and introduction of new formulations and applications, reducing the inconsistency of field performance and encouraging growers to implement this new technology.

Current research efforts in bioformulation technology are focused on delivery and application practices, especially on understanding the impact of plant defense induction kinetics on application timing and placement of the formulated product.


Until recently, slow progress in formulation and delivery research has been a major hurdle to biopesticide development and acceptance.

There are significant costs involved in solving the biological issues of biopesticide formulations (including storage and field stability as well efficacy consistency), and these can preclude standalone small companies entering the market.

However, formulation is one of the key factors in determining the commercial success of a biopesticide candidate, and the benefits in terms of market access and the acceptance of biopesticides as viable commercial alternatives or supplements to conventional plant protection products suffice to warrant this effort.



The current model of relying almost exclusively on synthetic chemicals is changing.

Biopesticides present unique and complex modes of action and agronomic practices. Most agricultural biopesticides are suited for incorporation into IPM programmes, in conjunction with traditional pesticides which, in turn, is contributing to the rapid increase in use of biopesticides.

Today more and better biological active ingredients and products are available that can compete with, as well as complement conventional chemical pesticides. Demand, too, is driven by our increased knowledge about biopesticides mode of action and refined application rates and methods.


Currently, biopesticides may demand higher unit prices compared to chemical pesticides, in part due to economies of scale, and the associated limited product availability is a further restraint to the growth in acceptance of biopesticides. On the other hand, locally produced biopesticides may be less costly than conventional, chemical pesticides.

There is a perception of lower and variable efficacy, shorter persistence, and greater dependence on environmental conditions on the part of end users.

Too often growers experience the frustration of inconsistent efficacy following the application of biologicals when disease pressures are already too high. When applied with due regard for factors such as plant-response kinetics and disease pressure development, these same products prove to be highly efficacious.

Currently, reports of inconsistent efficacy lead to either over-optimism or skepticism on the part of marketers, corporate decision makers, and farmers alike.

Biopesticides require knowledge-intensive management systems to develop and use them effectively. Crop protection biologists have a unique responsibility to mediate an understanding of the drivers of biopesticide efficacy, and to ensure innovation- and knowledge dissemination in the development and implementation of commercial strategies.

An increasing willingness to invest in field testing by agrichemical majors is addressing the perception of low efficacy and greater variability for biopesticides. However, start-ups and other smaller, innovative companies may not have funds for extensive demonstration trials and customer education.

Leave a Reply



Marrone Bio Innovations Names Hammill as Chief Commercial Officer

Most recently, Hammill was Chief Operating Officer at Pivot Bio, a startup company.


STK, BASF in Deal to Expand Distribution in Brazil

STK will grant BASF exclusive rights to maket and sell the biological fungicide bactericide in the country.

Africa/Middle East

Affinity in East Africa: Marrone Bio Innovations Finds Harmonious Partner in Kenya Biologics

Farmers in East Africa are set to benefit from a wide range of zero-residue biopesticides that will help to increase


Marrone Bio Innovations Enters Partnership with Israel’s Lidorr

Lidorr Chemicals Ltd., will develop and market three of MBI's products in Israel.


IPM and ICM: The Unique Opportunities and Challenges for Biopesticides

Integrated crop management (ICM) is a holistic approach to crop management, integrating agricultural and environmental management practices such as optimal


Monsanto, AgriMetis Enter Global Licensing Agreement

The agreement includes an exclusive global license from AgriMetis to Monsanto for agricultural research in row, vegetable, and other crops for a three-year period.


ADAMA’s Nimitz Gets Regulatory Approval in Brazil

Global crop protection company ADAMA announced that it has successfully obtained regulatory approval for its proprietary nematicide, NIMITZ®, in Brazil.


Brazil, China, France to Drive Rapid Biopesticide Growth

The use of biopesticides, primarily live microbial products, as seed treatments increased in almost every country surveyed.


Stockton Rebrands, Changes Name to STK

Stockton, the innovative Israel – based leader in bio-ag technology for sustainable crop protection and aquaculture, has announed a company


Agrolab, BioScience Solutions Form Cooperation Agreement for Biopesticides

Agrolab and BioScience Solutions have announced a cooperation regarding consultancy for development of biopesticides. Harry Teicher, owner and founder of


Biopesticide Regulation: A Comparison of EU and U.S. Approval Processes

Biopesticides (microbial pesticides, bio-derived chemicals, and plant-incorporated protectants) introduce unique and complex modes of action and may be used in


Stockton Group: Chinese Regulation Changes a Boon for Biopesticides

“It’s known that in China when the government decides something it happens fast,” says Guy Elitzur, CEO of Stockton Group, a


Biological Fungicides: A Key Element in Farmers’ Toolboxes

One great challenge of modern agriculture is to find disease control mechanisms that are efficient alternatives to those of chemical


Importance of Giving Biologicals a Head Start

Within past decade or so, the biological crop protection market has expanded at an unprecedented rate. The use of microorganisms

Pam Marrone

Marrone Bio Innovations Forms Distribution Partnership in the Philippines

Marrone Bio Innovations, Inc. (MBI), a leading provider of bio-based pest management and plant health products for the agriculture, turf


Despite Growth, Old Perceptions Inhibit Adoption of Biopesticides

There are more than 60 companies offering more than 1,400 biopesticide products, creating a powerful wave that will continue to


Marrone Bio Innovations Announces Comprehensive Financing and Debt Restructuring Transaction

Marrone Bio Innovations, Inc., a leading provider of bio-based pest management and plant health products for the agriculture, turf and


BioProtection Association Expands Global Footprint, Elects New President

BioProtection Global (BPG), the global association of regional trade organizations representing the biological products industry, has announced the incorporation of


Slideshow: AgriBusiness Global Hosts Trade Summit Southeast Asia

AgriBusiness Global hosted its Trade Summit Southeast Asia from Dec. 5-6 in Jakarta, Indonesia at the J S Luwansa Hotel.

Latest News


Bayer: Disappointing Verdict Requires In-Depth Analysis

Bayer will assess the verdict’s consequences and potential legal options.

Seeds and Traits

BASF Releases Provisia Rice System for 2018 Season

Provisia is first herbicide tolerant system in the U.S. rice market since the Clearfield Production System was released 15 years ago.


EU Court Backs Ban on Three Neonicotinoids

General Court of the European Union said it "confirms the validity of the restrictions introduced at EU level in 2013 clothianidin, thiamethoxam and imidacloprid because of the risks those substances pose to bees."

Seeds and Traits

Corteva Agriscience, Monsanto in Licensing Deal on Trait for Insect Control

Corteva Agriscience will receive a license to stack Monsanto’s Corn Rootworm III and MON89034 traits with Corteva Agriscience’s insect control traits.


Formulation Technology Matters with High-Activity Sulfonylurea Herbicides

Herbicide formulations and sprayer clean-out are top of mind for many farmers, applicators, and retailers because of issues with dicamba